The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
The first pie chart compares the power consumption in a typical Australian house whereas the second one presents data on the percentages of greenhouse effects of these power-consuming equipment. As a general trend, the more energy a household appliance use, the more greenhouse gas it emits.
As can be seen, water heating, keeping the house warm or cool consume almost half of the energy required in an average Australian family. Cooking, standby, and lighting all together utilize around 20% power while refrigerators alone need 12% electricity. All other appliances consume the rest one-quarter energy share.
Interestingly, there is a correlation between the percentage of energy a particular device requires to run and the percentage of greenhouse gas this device produces with the exception of heating and cooling device. Heating water, warming, and cooling the rooms attribute to more than half of the total greenhouse gas emissions. Cooking, standby by and lighting combinedly contribute to 14% gas production which is almost the same as the amount produced by other appliances in a house.
In summary, heating and cooling devices emit the highest percentages of greenhouse gas though they consume less power than water heaters. Other devices contribute to emitting dangerous gases based on the percentages of energy they require to function.
- the graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 87
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 73
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world Do you think that benefi 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enhouse gas it emits. As can be seen, water heating, keeping the house warm or...
^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'running'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: running
... of energy a particular device requires to run and the percentage of greenhouse gas th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
... of greenhouse gas this device produces with the exception of heating and cooling device. Heating wat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roduced by other appliances in a house. In summary, heating and cooling devices ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'functioning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: functioning
... the percentages of energy they require to function.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, whereas, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47619047619 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9545153575 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7117079968 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215458833964 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835145706732 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574920425768 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131602206771 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691529996598 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.