The two pie charts contain energy data consuming by Australian household as well as the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions caused by energy using.
Overall, inhabitants in Australia expense a large amount of energy in heating water which comes along with high greenhouse gas emissions. For cooling purpose, the data accounting for a very tiny level of the whole figures.
In the first chart, the percentage of energy using for heating application is by far the most prominent one, at just nearly 50%. To a lesser extent, water heating is another main purpose of energy consuming, with 30%. Other appliances is reported just a half of water heating figures. The remainders play a very small-scale figures, consuming just 13% collectively.
For the greenhouse gas emissions, water heating and other appliances are the main factors, causing 32% and 28% of gas amount respectively. The percentage of greenhouse gas resulted from heating and refrigeration are generally the same, approximately 15%. Cooling and lighting purposes is largely insignificant, leading 11% of emissions in total.
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which results from this energy use Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comp 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 56
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how toencourage them to spend their time walking 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'figure'?
Suggestion: figure
... The remainders play a very small-scale figures, consuming just 13% collectively. For ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, well, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38596491228 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00967967484 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9291961932 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224905128394 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086865735538 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076954578006 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148398205051 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672803226066 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.