As far as science, business and academics are concerned, special information sharing has been a controversy. While the idea of immense information sharing is advocated widely, I do believe that these valuable findings should not be publicised excessively.
It is undesirable that there are significant advantages of sharing information related to such highly professional fields. For fulfilling academic satisfaction and acknowledgement, a wide range of resources have to be revealed and open to the public. Thus, the capacity of being well-informed both for special and fundamental knowledges as a whole could be enriched greatly. Apart from that the freely reachable knowledge could stimulate further researches which could make some considerable advances for the scientific world itself.
However I personally suppose that over-sharing such important findings should be avoided. Science business and academy are the prominent areas whose researches have been professionally launched during many periods of time. All these hard-working findings, therefore, are justified for not publicising them easily. Despite the desire of being excellent in those areas, there could be undesirable risk-making people who manipulate it to steal important information at the expense of the original researchers. The unique and prominent findings could be leaked and copied by people who do not make any efforts at all.
In conclusion, although it is beneficial for information of science, business and academics to be revealed, they should be shared at some certain extent and some exercises to restrict its consequences have to be adopted.
- The line graph below shows the number of single family homes constructed in the United States by region over a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how toencourage them to spend their time walking 61
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibility Do you agree or disagree 61
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- c
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nces for the scientific world itself. However I personally suppose that over-sharing ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, apart from, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71193415638 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20893201256 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59670781893 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8780022646 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30981619536 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109568601948 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659448185587 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203866391203 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048761533455 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.