The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
The first pie chart illustrates how energy is used in an average Australian household, while the other one depicts the greenhouse gas emissions caused by this energy use. Overall, an Australian household preferred to use energy for heating and water heating, while cooling was the least common choice. Accordings, water heating and other appliances caused the highest proportion of emissions from the consumption of energy, whereas cooling was less harmful to the environment.
Regarding the use of energy in a household in Australia, the Australian people often used heating and water heating, at 42% and 30% respectively. To a lesser extent, the figure for other appliances made up 15%, followed by the refrigerator, at less than 10%. Lighting and cooling accounted for the lowest proportion of energy, at only 4% and 2% respectively.
On the other hand, although heating was used frequently, water heating and other appliances caused most of the greenhouse gas emissions, at 32% and 28% respectively. Meanwhile, the figure for heating and refrigerator represented almost the same proportion, at around 15%. The appliances which were less harmful to the environment were lighting and cooling, at only 8% and 3% respectively.
- The line chart shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000 and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 73
- The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000 and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts give information about the number of sick days the population of an imaginary country took for three dififerent years The line graph shows the amount of money spent on healthcare per person per year from 1970 until 1990 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39896373057 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05200259801 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512953367876 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6021112093 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.777777778 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267433831733 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121740955681 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16968353143 0.0843802449381 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189706101584 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146797760862 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.