The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy used.
The given pie charts give information about the way of using energy in an average Australian household and the greenhouse gas emissions resulting from using energy in this household.
Overall, as can be seen from the pie charts, it is clear that in this Australian household, the amount of energy is used for heating most while the opposite is true for cooling. In addition, the amount of gas emissions released to the environment mostly comes from water heating and other appliances.
Looking more closely at how an average household in Australia uses energy, the rate of energy used for heating is the highest, at about two-fifths, while the figure for water heating is significantly lower, at 30%. At the same time, only 2%, 4%, and 7% of the energy used in this household are used for cooling, lighting, and refrigeration respectively. Additionally, the proportion of using other appliances in using energy in this family accounted for roughly 15% of the total energy used.
According to the greenhouse gas emissions resulting from using energy in this Australian household, it is clear that the gas emission released into the environment by using water heating is highest, at nearly a third, while 29% of the greenhouse emissions in this family come from heating and refrigeration, roughly 15% for each. Meanwhile, approximately 28% of the total emission is resulted from using other appliances. Moreover, cooling and lighting make up only 3% and 8% of the total greenhouse gas emissions resulting from using energy respectively.
- The pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 and 1991 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy used 67
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in 5 different countries in 2002 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.176 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92020821175 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.1912679333 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.777777778 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470795033746 0.215688989381 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.246571105642 0.103423049105 238% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133228114981 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.352996315873 0.15604864568 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145828149422 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.