The first pie chart depicts the structure of the energy consumption in an average household in Australia. The second pie chart represents the greenhouse gas emissions as a consequence of this energy usage.
Overall, heating of the living space and water is responsible for the most significant amount of the energy used in a household in Australia. However, greenhouse gases emissions are not allocated in the same way as the energy consumption, and some less energy-demanding uses are more harmful to the environment.
The closer look at the first chart shows that the heating, whether of the house or the water, is responsible for over 70% of the total household energy usage. Other appliances use 15% of the energy, while refrigeration, lighting and cooling spend 7%, 4% and 2% of the total energy, respectively.
Water heating is the most responsible for the greenhouse gases emissions with 32% of all the gases created by a household in Australia. Other appliances, produce 28% of the greenhouse gases, although their contribution to the total energy consumption is two times smaller. Refrigeration is a large pollutant compared to its energy consumption, generating 14% of hazardous gases. Heating, on the other hand, is rather clean, causing only 15% of the greenhouse gases emissions. Cooling and lighting create 11% combined, which is almost two times more compared to their share in the energy consumption.
- The chart below gives information about southland's main exports in 2000, 20*..,and future projections for 2025.(20*..:for test purposes, use and refer to the current year) 89
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is positive or negative development? 89
- IELTS Task 1 - Tables give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 73
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents an 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, so, while, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26315789474 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07702244021 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517543859649 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.105936413 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.090909091 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321299165675 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126201639282 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827917017779 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211511135563 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850435489697 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.