The first graph gives the number of passengers travelling by train in Sydney. The second graph provides information on the percentage of trains running on time.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph line A& B in combination depicts, total number of passengers (in millions), using train as main transportation in Sydney and the ratio of trains running on time between 1995 to 2004.
Overall, as shown by graph line, the number of train passengers were gradually peaking in first half and start falling down, additionally, with varied fluctuation the proportion of on time trains declined dramatically.
In details, as information provided by first graph, roughly 250 million passengers used train in Sydney at 1995, while, this graph steadily uplifted and reached nearly 270 million in 1999. After that, with rapid upsurged, in 2001 300 million people used train as main transportation. But, this increasing trend did not stay longer, after next year it start lowering and accounted around 280 million in 2004.
Regarding to second graph line, the schedule of trains running time was excellent in 1995 with over 92%, but this excellency did not stay longer and dropped to around 85% in 1997. After 1997, next 2 years, the performance again soared and reached approximately 94% in 1999. This is the highest ration over the surveyed period and with varied fluctuation in between, in 2002 the ratio again gained same point as 1999. Although, after 2000, the graph line showed the worst situation, rocketed diminishing and reached around 72% in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-13 | asmita acharya | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | Jonkun | 82 | view |
- The graphs below show how people in a European city reached their office and got back home in 1959 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that genetically modified GM crops are a positive development Others however argue that they are potentially dangerous Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Unemployment remains the biggest challenge to school leavers in most countries How far do you agree with this assessment What other challenges face young people today 84
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne 73
- Some people think that genetically modified GM crops are a positive development Others however argue that they are potentially dangerous Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13963963964 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67370707452 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572072072072 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1689188602 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.777777778 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288053236656 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118427993946 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112583191497 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202922659099 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735555764895 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.