flow chart consequences of deforestation.
The flow chart shows what typically occurs as a consequence of deforestation. Overall, there are four different pathways that lead to two main consequences.
One immediate effect is heavy logging equipment in result, the soil becomes hard and “baked which lead to rain water runs off and flooding.
Another immediate effect consequences is that fewer roots hold the top soil in place and because of that the top soil erodes.
Third effect is increased risk of burning(deliberate or accidental) which lead to waste wood from logging is destroyed after that the micro-organism are feeding on waste lost and by the following consequences lead to that pioneer species move in,vegetation is degraded and less biodiversity.
The last consequence is the plants return less moisture and because of that there is less precipitation, subsequently increased drought.
In conclusion, the clear cutting of forest lead to four main consequences which is damaging the enviroment.
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purpse. 73
- the charts below show the main reasons for study support by their employers. 61
- The flow chary illustrates the consequences of deforestation. 73
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists. 56
- Proportion of populatio aged 65 and over. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , vegetation
...ces lead to that pioneer species move in,vegetation is degraded and less biodiversity. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52317880795 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24851819883 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596026490066 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8449317298 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219462045542 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121147972877 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189768583595 0.0843802449381 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108045916699 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124542987139 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.