The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart shows the changing patterns of transport use in a European city during the period from 1960 to 2000. In brief, the chart shows that the use of the car as a means of transport dramatically increased over the period shown, while the others fell.
In detail, in 1960 the motor car was used least as a method of transport with only about 7% of the population using this method but car use grew steadily and strongly to finally reach about 37% of the population by 2000. This was a massive 5-fold increase in use.
Over this same period, however, the popularity of walking, which had been the most popular means of transport with 35% of the population in 1960 having it as their preferred way of getting around, fell to 10%. Bicycle use also fell from a high of about 27% in 1960 to just 7% in 2000.
On the other hand, bus use was more erratic being popular with almost 20% of the population in 1960 and rising to a peak of about 27% in 1980 before falling back to about 18% in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-03 | tata | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | tata | view | |
| 2021-04-25 | Poinsettia03 | 81 | view |
| 2021-04-25 | Poinsettia03 | 81 | view |
| 2021-02-05 | RazzaqovAmir | 71 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the progress of certain diseases during childhood between 1950 and 2000 in a developing country 70
- The graph below gives information about the progress of certain diseases during childhood between 1950 and 2000 in a developing country
- The graph below gives information about the progress of certain diseases during childhood between 1950 and 2000 in a developing country
- The pie charts below show online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, so, while, in brief, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.33510638298 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22553471177 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521276595745 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8464276581 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.428571429 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214423762374 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12406727895 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101024380095 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141542881246 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829102565922 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.93 61.2550243902 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.