A glance at the provided bar chart illustrates the results of accommodation preference survey among UK people lived in Liverpool, London, and Manchester in 2009. In general, it is clearly apparent that apartments was the most popular dwellings in Liverpool, while semi-detached houses were the first of choice housings both in London and Manchester.
Looking in more details from the chart, the vast majority of Liverpool inhabitants preferred to live in apartments at almost 60% while those who chose detached and semi-detached houses only reported at 15% and 19%, respectively. On the other hand, terraced houses were chosen by Liverpool residents at near 10%. Interestingly, in London and Manchester, semi-detached houses gained popularity the most at the same percentage (approximately 39%). Additionally, detached houses also had considerable enthusiast in Manchester at 35% compared to only 25% in London. However, 30% of London residents tent to live in apartments. Finally, terraced houses also reported to be the least preference housing in London and Manchester at 10% to 20%.
- Many teenagers now have their own smart phone Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this and give your own opinion 78
- The chart below shows information about subway systems in three major European cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main information and making comparisons 67
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 73
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, look, so, thus, well, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51497005988 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22577245722 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616766467066 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6841368313 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175909014331 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857083000498 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875560448573 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172711444246 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711604952446 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, look, so, thus, well, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51497005988 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22577245722 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616766467066 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6841368313 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175909014331 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857083000498 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875560448573 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172711444246 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711604952446 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.