The following chart illustrates the results of a British survey taken in 2005 related to Housing preferences of UK people.
The chart represents the proportion of British people's preferences with four different types of houses in UK in 2005.
Overall, majority British people preferred flat in London, whereas detached and semi-detached houses were more popular among the people of Oxford and Cambridge.
Looking in details for London, majority of people preferred to live in flat (of close to 60%) than other types of houses; semi-detached houses of about 18%, terraced houses of around 15% and detached houses had the lowest percentage of close to 10%.
In contrast, Cambridge was popular for detached houses of about 35% in comparison to semi-detached houses of about 25%, flats of 20% and terraced houses of 18%.
Concurrently, people from Oxford preferred in most types of housing except for terraced houses. Flats, detached houses and semi-detached houses had recorded of between 25% and 20% of preference proportions in opposed to 18% of terraced houses.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-12-16 | ililmaidatuz | 84 | view |
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 78
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- Some people believe that government should spend money on new building rather than renovating existing building To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- “Prevention is better than cure”. Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. To what extent do you agree? 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 73
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'look', 'so', 'whereas', 'except for', 'in contrast']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.314285714286 0.268076937826 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.08 0.116061578633 69% => OK
Adjectives: 0.125714285714 0.0759168565197 166% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0285714285714 0.0366838410393 78% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.205714285714 0.155750635184 132% => OK
Participles: 0.0342857142857 0.0379272487307 90% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85477196733 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0285714285714 0.0210936926555 135% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0228571428571 0.0948980150116 24% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.00967000014798 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 940.0 1161.00487805 81% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.9 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.30872483221 5.90752243213 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73763899035 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.44966442953 0.337110787985 133% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.315436241611 0.247514529752 127% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208053691275 0.171178102325 122% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.127516778523 0.112407865282 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85477196733 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496644295302 0.546246751206 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 38.2241545482 49.3433353143 77% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 8.93414634146 67% => OK
Sentence length: 24.8333333333 23.0094962315 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5794656922 42.9750493124 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.666666667 135.714022679 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 23.0094962315 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.689975730869 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.84146341463 130% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 56.3769574944 47.7609492067 118% => OK
Elegance: 5.10526315789 2.94281807926 173% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349256026544 0.418131533498 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.274565333828 0.181151798455 152% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.136013841954 0.0850326197045 160% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.911887486421 0.706616315825 129% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140971935133 0.157042692854 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.241463604661 0.228904883108 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108093877768 0.108899403657 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.458228234182 0.367819155151 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.194350497642 0.0812612215331 239% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265337169725 0.316326947829 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105586044817 0.0921553760075 115% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70731707317 54% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.14146341463 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.16585365854 63% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 0.956097560976 209% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 7.1512195122 84% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.