gallery 3
The two maps illustrate the redevelopments of an art gallery ground floor between 2005 and the present.
Overall, there have been significant changes taking place in the art gallery particularly on the left-hand side of the room, including the removal of exhibition room number 4, the addition of new facilities, and the rearrangement of functional rooms. These alterations must have made this gallery more visitor-friendly and accessible.
It can be seen from the two maps that the three exhibition rooms on the right-hand side of the gallery have remained unchanged in terms of size and position throughout the given period. Meanwhile, the installation of a ramp at the entrance and a new lift next to the back stairs lead to an upper floor making the gallery more accessible for those who use wheelchairs. Furthermore, the rectangle reception desk in the middle of the room has changed to a circle one and relocated near the entrance.
Looking at the left-hand side of the room, exhibition room 4 has been divided into two areas, the temporary exhibitions and the children’s interactive playground. Another major change was the removal of the gallery room to the top left corner of the room where was the coffee and art shop. In addition, the vending machine selling coffee and food now is seen in front of the gallery room.
- GALLERY 78
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person so medical service should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages 72
- The table gives information about favorite types of films by age group 73
- gallery 3 73
- WHEAT 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99551569507 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93613439709 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569506726457 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2551514465 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.777777778 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280264321635 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139053280648 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798818274824 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196607151496 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224145914779 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.