The GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010
The bar chart given below illustrate the GFP development each year on behalf of three states between 2007 and 2010. Overall, it can be seen the largest percentage for GDP expansion annually in three states is Tunisia. Inverse of those, the trivial percentage is obtained by ecuador. It is measured in percentage.
Regarding to the data started from 2007 to 2008 the GDP development for two state (Japan and Ecuador) has similarity, increased significantly. Where Japan was from 2 % to 4 % an ecuador was from 3.1 % to 4.9 %. One country was dipped approximately 1.9 % in GDP growth from 6.2% to 4.3 % in Tunisia
Between 2008 and 2010 the GDP development saw a fluctuation in three states. There was a rapid peak about 1.1% n the GPD growth from 4.1% to 5.2 % between 2008 and 2009 in Japan. While between 2009 and 2010 there was considerable climb of 1.4 % in Japan GDP development from 5.2% to 6.6%. Two other countries the GDP development decreased significantly during two years. Tunisia GDP growth registered a significant go down between 2008 and 2010 with 1.15 % completely failed a bit diverge from the Ecuador GDP development. That was reduced enormously from 4.9% to 1.2 % during 2008 until 2009 and saw a moderate growth from 1.2% to 2.2% between 2009 and 2010
- The main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 67
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems 73
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective and at worst the may be dangerous 67
- The challenges people face when they go to live in other countries 67
- Information about rail transport in four countries in 2017 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...as similarity, increased significantly. Where Japan was from 2 % to 4 % an ecuador wa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86111111111 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80149652902 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560185185185 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2828471889 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355026843192 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133150879529 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100269574948 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232302797893 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577065304913 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.