The ghraph below shows the three different kinds of emission source oil coal gas of greenhouse gas in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The ghraph below shows the three different kinds of emission source (oil, coal, gas) of greenhouse gas in the UK. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart elucidate the information about the three various parts of emission sources of greenhouse gas in the United Kingdom. The data is calculated in million tons.

Overall, it is evident that the most striking set of statistics relate to the gas emission of gas that rose from 1990 to 2010 and the emission of coal was minimum in all given years.
C
Getting back to the detail, it is crystal clear from the potrayed figure that the emission of oil in 1990 was 270 million tons after the five years, oil emission 30 million tons declined and then it was started decreasing between 2020 and 2010 it still under 250 million tons to 200 million tons.

By scrutinizing the data it can be vividly seen that, greenhouse gas emission minimally increased throughout the year from 210 million tons to 320 but coal emission slightly decreased. In 1990 the emission was 300 million tons and in next given year the amount of coal emission was 270 million tons but in 2000 and 2005 the emission was almost near the 250 million tons additionly in 2010 the emission of coal was 180 million tons.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (25 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-06 anh801 100 view
Essays by user Pinki goyal :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ited Kingdom. The data is calculated in million tons. Overall, it is evident that t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n tons but in 2000 and 2005 the emission was almost near the 250 million tons add...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65463917526 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37125167794 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479381443299 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.7152075229 43.030603864 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.5 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3333333333 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167221717704 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109538579482 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759104127618 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132944603506 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538483349876 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.