The given charts give information about the number of students at a university in the UK from 1991 to 2001 government spending and the types of family economic background they came from in 1991

Essay topics:

The given charts give information about the number of students at a university in the UK from 1991 to 2001, government spending and the types of family economic background they came from in 1991.

The three different diagrams illustrate varied information about the number of colleagues in the UK, and the budgets of government spending for students from 1991 to 2001. Overall, the figures for students who had middle income, and the number of students in 1999, and the budgets from the government in 1991 were sharply high in three varied charts.

A closer look at the pie chart reveals that in 1991, the figures for middle income ranked first, accounted for 62% . The proportion of high income and low income from students’ families was noticeable low, constituted 30% and 8% respectively. Turning to the bar chart, from 1991 to 1995, the number of the UK’s students at university was slight growth, accounted for around 10 millions in 1991 to a mere 15 millions in 1995. In contrast, those figures changed dramatically, constituted from around 16 million in 1997 and reached a peak in 1999 with a mere 22 million and accounted for under 20 million.

According to the line graph, the budgets from government reached a peak in 1991, constituted 6500 pound, after which this figure dramatically decreased to under 5000 in 2001.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-24 nobitaa 73 view
2021-11-28 buiminhduc 82 view
2021-10-15 minhquanvn 73 view
Essays by user minhquanvn :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e income ranked first, accounted for 62% . The proportion of high income and low i...
^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...eached a peak in 1991, constituted 6500 pound, after which this figure dramatically d...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08421052632 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72098225185 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531578947368 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.2949942616 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 138.0 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349767096667 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17818133904 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10983712903 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234910795477 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798192733759 0.0819641961636 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.