the given graph show the consumption of fast food in the UK ( per week) from 1970 to 1990
The line graph compare how many grams food were bought in the UK using from three types of fast food in per week from 1970 to 1990.
Overall, there was a decrease of pizza over a period shown while both Fish and Chips and Hamburger had an upward trend in each year.
By the year 1970, the number of pizza consumed is the highest over 300 grams weekly and the number of hamburger was the lowest around 30 grams. Meanwhile, about 80 grams Fish and chips were eaten weekly in UK. In 1985, consumption of pizza went down and reached a bottom of 200 grams whereas other figures rise gradually.
In 1990, Fish and Chips were eaten by UK people peaked at 500 grams per week and became the highest figure in the line graph, hamburger also increased approximately 300 grams weekly. During the same time, the number of pizza consumed remained stable roughly 200 grams.
- the given graph show the consumption of fast food in the UK ( per week) from 1970 to 1990 73
- the line graph gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 56
- the line graph gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 56
- the table shows the monthly expenditures of an average Australian family from 1991 to 2001 56
- People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'grams'' or 'gram's'?
Suggestion: grams'; gram's
The line graph compare how many grams food were bought in the UK using from t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 708.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53846153846 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.08931095097 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7719534421 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272939253828 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123234144771 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156526971922 0.0843802449381 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183524439388 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180525011146 0.0819641961636 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.