The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990.
The line graph below shows the information about the expenditure on fast food of the British people on a week basic between 1970 and 1990.
It is clear from the chart that the fish and chips consumed the highest figure in the chart. Additionally, the number of pizza fell during the research period.
In the first 10 years, the number of hamburger increased slightly from just over 30 grams to 100 grams approximately. Meanwhile, the figures of pizza was sharply decreased from 300 gram to about 200 grams. Beside, the number of fish and chips slight growed up by 51 grams .
Over the next 10 years, the number of hamburger and fish, chips went up dramatically about 380 grams and 200 grams respectively. However, the expenditure on pizza in this period seem to be remain constant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-01 | Phanvananh | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have educational value. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 73
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 56
- People tend to work longer hours nowadays. Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and the society so working hours should be restricted. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 61
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below shows the information about the e...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...of pizza was sharply decreased from 300 gram to about 200 grams. Beside, the number ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...h and chips slight growed up by 51 grams . Over the next 10 years, the number of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 651.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 136.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78676470588 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.41495297035 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59913468143 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610294117647 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 180.9 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1387523612 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.375 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132955554098 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586358369939 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109016730373 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104840926161 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138017795367 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.