The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990

The line graph bestows the weekly consumption of three various categories of junk food in the British between 1970 and 1990.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is apparent that whilst the quantities of Hamburger and Fish & Chips proffered upward tendencies, Pizza was consumed witnessed downward trends. Additionally, the data of inquiries in person experienced the most considerable change among the divergent options.
In 1970, the amount of Pizza consumed was highest, at above 300 grams, whereas approximately 80 grams of Fish & Chips were eaten by UK people and the volume for Hamburger was markedly lower, at only around 30 grams. In 1985, Pizza consumption slightly dropped and reached the lowest point of a mere 200 grams, meanwhile, the other two figures gradually went up.
In 1990, Fish & Chips weekly consumption enhanced considerably to 500 grams and became the greatest figure in the whole period, while Hamburger’s data experienced a slight rise to about 300 grams. At the same time, the amount of Pizza eaten remained stable at roughly 200 grams.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e other two figures gradually went up. In 1990, Fish & Chips weekly consumption e...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27485380117 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81282944959 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66081871345 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1785573123 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.857142857 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156864900591 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075053547024 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987424240575 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11707348648 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109460665243 0.0819641961636 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.