The given graphs represents number of students in uk from 1991 to 2001 and government expenditure and different family economic bakground.

The pie chart shows the percentage of student by income in 1991. Beside, the bar chart and the line graph illustrate the amount of student at UK's university and the expenditure of government spending on each student respectively.

Obivously, we can easily realize some main features in these given chart. The families is in middle income level, they were willing to take their children to the school the most. Quanlity's student, who had opportunity studying at university in UK, increased year by year. But, government spending was declining over the same period.

According to the pie chart, income's student families was devided in three levels, low, middle and high. The highest amount of percentage is middle income with 62%. The second position belonged to the high level group. And, the finally one was only 8%, low income.

In the 10-year period, the number of students rose dramatically, almost double from 1991 to 2001. It's noticeable in 1999, the year had the highest student in school, approximately 21 million.

Government expenditure per student decreased considerably during 10 years. By 1991, this cost was about 6500 pond. But, the spending was just under 5000 pond in the year 2001. That's decreased approximately 1750 pond.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...ures in these given chart. The families is in middle income level, they were willi...
^^
Line 9, column 110, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pond' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'ponds'.
Suggestion: ponds
...ears. By 1991, this cost was about 6500 pond. But, the spending was just under 5000 ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 154, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pond' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'ponds'.
Suggestion: ponds
.... But, the spending was just under 5000 pond in the year 2001. Thats decreased appro...
^^^^
Line 9, column 177, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... just under 5000 pond in the year 2001. Thats decreased approximately 1750 pond.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20792079208 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67473373788 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628712871287 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9788234121 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.75 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.625 22.9334400587 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248738253089 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708847690624 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071057723693 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135973044942 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651120833288 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.05 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.