The given line chart demonstrates average attendance at the cinema across age demographics in the US between 2000 and 2011. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that young people, especially teenagers and young adults, tend to go to the cinema with usual frequency. In contrast, people got older, tended to go to the cinema less frequently.
Those aged 15-24 years old began the period with roughly 15% going to the cinema, which is the leading figure over other demographics. This figure then witnessed a rise to over 30% by 2004, fluctuated between 35% and 50% for the next several years before finishing at approximately 52% in 2011. By contrary, theater attendance from the age 35 and over started the lowest period with only 1% in the first years, after which experienced a consistent growth for several years and ended with the figure being recorded at about 13%.
Turning to 7-14 and 25-35 years-old cinema-goers, the figure for people who aged 7-14 years old started at 10%, which was double the figure for 25-35 years-old theater goers in the first years. After a six years, cinema attendance witnessed a surge to 20% and 14% correspondingly after period of constant fluctuation and finished at the identical figure, at 30% in the last year.
The given line chart demonstrates average attendance at the cinema across age demographics in the US between 2000 and 2011. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that young people, especially teenagers and young adults, tend to go to the cinema with usual frequency. In contrast, people got older, tended to go to the cinema less frequently.
Those aged 15-24 years old began the period with roughly 15% going to the cinema, which is the leading figure over other demographics. This figure then witnessed a rise to over 30% by 2004, fluctuated between 35% and 50% for the next several years before finishing at approximately 52% in 2011. By contrary, theater attendance from the age 35 and over started the lowest period with only 1% in the first years, after which experienced a consistent growth for several years and ended with the figure being recorded at about 13%.
Turning to 7-14 and 25-35 years-old cinema-goers, the figure for people who aged 7-14 years old started at 10%, which was double the figure for 25-35 years-old theater goers in the first years. After a six years, cinema attendance witnessed a surge to 20% and 14% correspondingly after period of constant fluctuation and finished at the identical figure, at 30% in the last year.
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Many think that religion should be taught in schools while others think it should be avoided Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- The picture illustrates the disparity of a park named Grange Park between 1920 and today 73
- Research shows that some activities are good for health and others are bad Despite knowing that millions of people engage in unhealthy activities What is the cause of this What can be done 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graphs below show the total percentage of films released and the total percentage of ticket sales in 1996 and 2006 in a country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and m 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97196261682 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70282571313 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57476635514 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1718939165 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33563808755 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178546260198 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182420691065 0.0843802449381 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297315742312 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.298765380791 0.0819641961636 365% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.