The given line graph illustrates clients' average spending on mobile phone, national and international land line services every year from 2001 to 2010
From basic observation, the number of mobile phone services and international fixed-line services improved remarkably. By contrast, the number of national fixed-line services witnessed a downward trend over the period shown.
Starting at $700, National fixed-line services was most popularly used, following by the international fixed-line services at about $250. The mobile phone cost the least at $200 in 2001. From 2001 to 2006, the price of national fixed-line services slipped steadily back to $500; However, there was a significant increase to the same point at $500 in the cell phone service. International land line services witnessed a slight growth in its price over the same period
From 2006 to 2010, After meeting the same point, cell phone services were more and more expensive until it reached a peak of nearly $750. Nevertheless, the opposite trend was true for national land line services. This figure declined to only $300 in the last year. The price of international fixed-line services experienced no change during the same period.
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The bar chart shows the information of the number of volunteers and paid workers in 4 different roles in the sports sector of an Australian town in 2015
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- process of Pe uh raw tea and ripe tea 73
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010 33
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34920634921 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8579168068 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529100529101 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.7174735611 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.512222405919 0.215688989381 237% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213763152315 0.103423049105 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191471550533 0.0843802449381 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.410733734664 0.15604864568 263% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.264660704768 0.0819641961636 323% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34920634921 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8579168068 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529100529101 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.7174735611 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.512222405919 0.215688989381 237% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213763152315 0.103423049105 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191471550533 0.0843802449381 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.410733734664 0.15604864568 263% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.264660704768 0.0819641961636 323% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.