The given tabular cahrts dipicts the information about the world population categorised by six regions during 1920,2000,and 2050. The data is calibrated in percentum and billions which is clearly and coherently represented.
Overall, it can be noticeable that the highest world population was Asia whereas the lowest from Oceania.
It can be seen that world population was 2.5 billions whilst it had increased in 2000 which was 6 billions. Moreover, it will be also inclined 3% more in the year 2050. In addition to this, in the Africa it had been only 9% while in the year 2000, it was 5% more ,and it would be 20% in the year 2050. Furthermore, it had been 56%,60%,59% during the year 1950,2000,2050 respectively.
As far as trend was conserned, the world population in Europe had 22% in first year after that it was drop-down 10% as compare to the first year in 2000. As well as in the year 2050 it will be again decline with 5%. Apart from this, the population was 6% in 1950 of Latin America and it was constant in year 2000 and 2050. In the Trend of North America it had been 7% in the year 1950, after that it was 1% more as comparison to the 2050 year. In the last year Oceania had been same in all years.
- Nowadays people throw many old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throw away society outweigh any possible economic advantages ? 84
- The three pie charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001. 78
- The three pie charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001. 78
- The three pie charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001. 78
- The three pie charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...% while in the year 2000, it was 5% more ,and it would be 20% in the year 2050. Fu...
^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...he year 1950, after that it was 1% more as comparison to the 2050 year. In the las...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, apart from, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.21989528796 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40270216931 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471204188482 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7428732159 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120855774214 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639651995271 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397236095801 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933526922464 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382287533915 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 94.49 61.2550243902 154% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.2 11.4140731707 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.