The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree?
For the last few years, great achievements in science have made people pay more attention on it. By the same token, in many countries, the government has decided to only prioritize science subjects in order to develope and progress. Personally, I just partly agree with this notion.
To commence with, there are some reasons to believe that teaching science can make a great contribution to the development of a nation. Obviously, thanks to a lot of breakthroughs in various fields of science such as Physics, Mathematics and so on, the world can develope as it is today. For example, with the advent off calculation formulas as well as theorems, many construction works have been created such as Golden Gate Bridge, Egyptian Pyramids, etc. Another example is in the field of medicine, utilizing scientific horizons and continuously doing experiments, scientists have created antibiotics against fatal diseases. It means that people have more chances of being survived. Consequently, the quality of life will be improved. Moreover, learning science is able to help students enrich knowledge and become more creative. In other words, sooner or later, they will find out new things which could gain the country progress.
On the flip side, it seems that other subjects should be invested by the government. It is true that science is extremely vital but it is not all. Especially, in the era of globalization, the unity of language is becoming more and more significant. In other words, the need for investing in language teaching is necessary. Specifically, in the past, Vietnam's financial system pushed ahead slowly due to language barriers with European countries. However, nowadays, thanks to the focus on teaching foreign languages particularly English, lots of students are capable of speaking English fluently as well as studying abroad. As a result, after returning country home, students may help apply new innovations and advanced methods to domestic economy.
To sum up, I agree that science plays an important part in developing country, but other subjects are very necessary, too. Therefore, the government ought to allocate more funding to both teaching sciences and other subjects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-11 | thuybeo25092002 | 92 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communications, such as letters, emails, or telephone calls.Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 89
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- Health care should not be provided for free regardless of a person’s income. The health of a person is in their own hands and they should, therefore, be held accountable for that. Do you agree with this opinion? 84
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?What other measures do you think might be effective? Give reasons for your answer and include a 78
- Many management interviews are based around assessing not only a person’s level of experience and knowledge but also their personality. Is leadership an innate skill? What other characteristics do companies look for in a manager? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, it is true, to sum up, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 965.302439024 192% => OK
No of words: 349.0 196.424390244 178% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29799426934 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89772234208 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 106.607317073 202% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616045845272 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 283.868780488 199% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 8.94146341463 224% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6204608983 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.45 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.45 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 3.70975609756 404% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32738902759 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851401360723 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755871783422 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208247850963 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745254063848 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 40.7170731707 255% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.