The graph above shows the radio and television audience throughout the day in 1982.
The figure elucidates the number of two media’s audiences in a day in 1982. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the amount of television audiences.
To begin with, there was a gradual palpitation in the total of television audiences from 6.00 a.m., which made up at 0, to 10.00 a.m., which constituted at well below a tenth. Unexpectedly, the percentage of television audiences experienced a dramatic growth in the next 10 hours to peak at well over two-fifths in 8.00 p.m., nevertheless, it plunged tremendously in the following 10 hours, dropping to well less than 10% by the end of the period shown.
In accordance with radio audiences, 6.00 a.m. to 8.00 a.m. witnessed a significant upsurge in the amount of radio audiences where it, initially, stood at just beneath two-twentieths and soared to well beyond two-tenths at 10.00 a.m.. Unfortunately, it plummeted tremendously between 10.00 a.m., which was at a fifth, and 6.00 a.m. in the next day, which accounted approximately for 2%.
- Some people think that paying taxes is a big enough contribution to society, while other think people have more responsibilities as a member of society than only paying taxes. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Women should give up their jobs and go back to their traditional roles of home maker in order to reduce world’s unemployment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The maps : the plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 73
- In today’s competitive world, many families find it necessary for both parents go out to work. While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income, others feel they lack support because of their parents’ absence.Discuss bo 73
- The maps below shows the development of a particular area from 1965 to present day 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...d to well beyond two-tenths at 10.00 a.m.. Unfortunately, it plummeted tremendousl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09356725146 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14710089462 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590643274854 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4009561422 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.166666667 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135620287764 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841278374196 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547680091725 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112289993244 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044536722215 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.