The line chart illustrates the global digital 3D screens in a period of 7 years namely 2005 to 2011, while the bar chart provides information about the world 3D cinema releases, which are live action and animation in 8 years from 2004 to 2012.
In general, both data had an upward trend during the years. The proportions of both data increased steadily in the first 4 years and then rose notably in the rest years. From 2005 to 2008, animation maintained stably. Live action has started to appear since 2008.
According to the line chart, global digital 3D screens were at about a little more than 0. From 2005 to 2008, they grew gradually each year while from 2008, they rocketed to more than 30000 in 2010. Between 2010 and 2011, they had a slight rise and reached a peak at approximately 38000 screens.
Moreover, it can easily be seen in the bar chart that the animation had the unchanging data in the first 4 years, then increase rapidly from 2009 to 2012, reached a peak about 25. Furthermore, the live action started in 2008 with approximately half of the animation at that time. Then it rocketed to more or less 50 at 2012, nearly doubled of the animations.
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 56
- The graph and chart below give information about 3D cinema screens and film release Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The graph and chart below give information about 3D cinema screens and film release Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- Some people say that now that we can see films at our home there is no need to go to the cinema Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a theatre Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, moreover, then, while, in general, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6028708134 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43713102022 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535885167464 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.157393926 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4545454545 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978964219969 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033805963944 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635549822418 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0701407225536 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737148846566 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.