The graph and chart below give information about migration to the UK. The graph below shows how long immigrants in the year 2000-2008 intended to stay in the UK. And the pie-chart shows reasons for migration in 2008.
The graph line illustrate the period of time immigrants living in the UK from 2000 to 2008 as well as the reason why they tended to emirate this country.
From an overall perspective, while the number of individuals who have the trend to live in the United Kingdom up to 2 years witnessed a notable changes, the figure of 4 or more years were still remained unchanged. Furthermore the reason for migration for working purposes were also the highest figure.
It is clear to observe from the graph that the number of immigrants’ length up to two years in Britain experienced an upward trend from 2000 to 2004 and peaked at 250 thousand in 2004. Then, the more than two years figure still remained unchanged and had a downward trend at 2006 while the line of four or more years was still intact through 8 years. The two to four years data fluctuated slightly around 50 to 100 thousand immigrants and trailing behind to 2006 with an upward trend onwards.
Compared to the pie chart of reasons for migration, working data comprised approximately a quarter of Britain’s length of intended stay in 2008, at 38% and was the biggest proportion. According to this data, studying purposes was the second highest in this chart which occupied 32% in terms of percentage. While the company/Join family reasons accounted for 16%, the no reason stated and other purposes were the same figure at 7%.
- he charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The plan below show a school in 1985 and the school now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy Portugal between 1967 and 2007 89
- The graph and chart below give information about migration to the UK The graph below shows how long immigrants in the year 2000 2008 intended to stay in the UK And the pie chart shows reasons for migration in 2008 73
- The diagram below shows how oil is extracted in the production of perfume Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
The graph line illustrate the period of time immigrants living in the UK from 2000 t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 214, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...re years were still remained unchanged. Furthermore the reason for migration for working pu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er of immigrants’ length up to two years in Britain experienced an upward trend f...
^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2004 and peaked at 250 thousand in 2004. Then, the more than two years figure sti...
^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ough 8 years. The two to four years data fluctuated slightly around 50 to 100 tho...
^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd to 2006 with an upward trend onwards. Compared to the pie chart of reasons for...
^^^
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the pie chart of reasons for migration, working data comprised approximately a ...
^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons for migration, working data comprised approximately a quarter of Bri...
^^
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., at 38% and was the biggest proportion. According to this data, studying purpose...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, second, so, still, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82572614108 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67339732423 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551867219917 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 133.323437133 43.030603864 310% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 193.833333333 112.824112599 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.1666666667 22.9334400587 175% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 5.23603664747 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209389820202 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105997570294 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562500541597 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129380873133 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048109073633 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.8 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.3012195122 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.