The graph and chart have given information and forecast about the vehicle number and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020. Overall, It can be seen a number of vehicles sharply risen in given period and CO2 emission mostly accounted by cars, least by buses in the same period of time.
Firstly, vehicle number started with 20milian in 2000 then it is straightly climbed to 40Milian in 2010 but in 2020 it will rocket to 60milian.
On the other hand, the amount of CO2 emission by cars is 2.5tonnes in 2000, though it is recorded as 2.75 tonnes in 2010. While, buses, vans, and trucks are under 1 tonnes in 2000 and 2010. In addition to that CO2 emission by cars will reach 3 tonnes in 2020, similar trucks just over 1 tonnes.
In conclusion, the number of vehicles increases significantly impact on the CO2 emission level.
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the U.K. 61
- The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle number and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Consumption of fast food by Australian teenager 73
- The diagrams below show the design for a wind turbine and its location.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the man features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...nd CO2 emission mostly accounted by cars, least by buses in the same period of time. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ted by cars, least by buses in the same period of time. Firstly, vehicle number started wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, then, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 704.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69333333333 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39495766606 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 196.2 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8793492266 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.571428571 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8571428571 5.23603664747 226% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334605581369 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164044893232 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174371428551 0.0843802449381 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185447440128 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11165630936 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.