The graph and table below give information about four new painkilling drugs which have recently been tested on patients.
The bar graph provides the information of the painkillers’ price while the table shows the response of patients when examined with these drugs. It can be seen that the price of pain killing drugs contrasted to the speed effect, effectiveness, and the length of pain killing after given to the patients. However, the Asprobeta as the cheapest became the most curable painkillers for the patients.
To begin, the Herbelieve was the most expensive drug with £2.40 per packet, but it showed the ineffectiveness in reducing pain that 56% of patients felt ineffective performance. This contrasted to the Asprobeta as the cheapest pain healer that 68% of patients faced the very effective result of this new drug. In addition, Asprobeta also showed the longer pain killing effect that 61% of patients did not feel the pain for more than 4 hours. Again and again, Herbal painkillers only resulted less than 2 hours durability to kill the pain.
Moving to more detailed analysis, Paradocs and Iburight of which the price were fairly similar at £1.70 and £1.80 respectively became the average price of painkillers. These drugs were chosen by patients as the most reactive in killing their pain, taking only less than 10 minutes for both drugs.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-14 | Fayna Faradiena | 78 | view |
2019-11-07 | Fachri040495 | 78 | view |
2019-07-30 | Omfiann | 73 | view |
- FRUUT 11
- zz 11
- The proportion of money spent on various household expenses in Malaysia and Japan is shown in the pie chart 43
- Some people believe that boys and girls behave differently only because society teaches them that they are different What is your view 72
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07804878049 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76521264134 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575609756098 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1376686145 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114276107669 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530194649573 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395633577207 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852969941113 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554577943507 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.