The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line graph illustrates the amount of water used for agriculture, industry, and households from all over the world, while the table compares the water consumption in Brazil and the Congo in 2000.
In general, while global water use grew consequently from 1900 to 2000 in the three categories, and the amount of water used for agriculture ranked first. In addition, water consumption was significantly higher in Brazil than in the Congo.
As can be seen from the line graph, the majority of water use belonged to agriculture in 1900, at approximately 900km3. Nevertheless, the figures for industrial and domestic water use were nearly one-fifth of that of agriculture. The 1900-2000 period witnessed the most substantial increase of roughly 3000km3 in the amount of water used for agriculture. Likewise, industrial and domestic uses stood at about 1300 km3 and 300km3 in 2000 respectively.
Turning to the table, the population of Brazil, which accounted for 26500km2, was just over 33 times much more than in the Congo in 2000. Also, Brazil had 26400km2 irrigated land more than in the Congo. As a result, water consumption in Brazil was higher than in the Congo, which was 8m3.
- The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000 100
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 61
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
- The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000 67
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their countries What are the reasons for this What can be done to change this negative attitude towards international tourism 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11794871795 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87034762067 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517948717949 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2194841447 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 5.23603664747 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25866819874 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11848685065 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07536573363 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187084622074 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810866416203 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.