The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the volume of water used for three different sectors worldwide during the twentieth century, while the table compares the amount of water consumption in Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo (D.R.C) in 2000.
Overall, the maximum and minimum quantity of water was used for agriculture and domestic uses respectively between 1900 to 2000. Moreover, the irrigated land, population, and water consumption in Brazil are significantly more than D.R.C.
It is clear that the global water used for agricultural purposes in 1900 was around 500 km3 and dramatically increased to about 3000 km3 in 2000. Water consumption in both industry and household use also rose until mid-century, and then industrial use grew gradually to around 1200 km3; however, domestic use grew more slowly to nearly 300 km3 at the end of the century.
It can be seen that the irrigated land in Brazil is 26500km2 which is significantly higher than that in D.R.C. In addition, the population of Brazil is 176 million; however, the number of people who lived in D.R.C was just 5.3 million in 2000. Water consumption in D.C.R was 8m3 per person, while it is 45 times less than in Brazil.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-22 | nijam | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | maiphuonganh | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-30 | Johndavisvu | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | mina_sharifi | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | mina_sharifi | 11 | view |
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 61
- At present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project 76
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 70
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: C
...il and Democratic Republic of Congo D.R.C in 2000. Overall, the maximum and mini...
^
Line 6, column 213, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: C
..., the number of people who lived in D.R.C was just 5.3 million in 2000. Water con...
^
Line 6, column 270, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: R
...llion in 2000. Water consumption in D.C.R was 8m3 per person, while it is 45 time...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02538071066 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75650876855 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56345177665 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.8296343576 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.0 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8333333333 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193398657529 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108420531357 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662482204575 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132759068918 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645186285091 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.