The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph provided reveals the changes that took place in the Chinese and USA birth rates in the period from 1920 to 2000.
Overall, the birth rates of both countries fluctuated in a down-ward trend over the period of 80 years. Although, the two trends were similar in terms of a general decline, the birth rate of the USA was higher than that of China in most years of the period shown.
It can be seen from the graph that from 1920 to 1930, the US birth rate fluctuated, although it always remained above 10%. However, in the following decade, the birth rate in the USA fell sharply to under 5%, followed by a considerable increase to hit a high of 15% in 1950. Throughout the remainder of the period, the US birth rate undergone a steady decrease and ended the period down to bottom out at approximately 7% in 2000.
In 1920 the birth rate of China was slight lower than that of the US, at about 10% and 12% respectively. However, in 1950, the Chinese birth rate experienced a marked growth of about 15% to reach the highest point of the whole line graph, at roughly 20%. From the year 1955 onwards, like the trend of the US birth rate, the birth rate of China declined gradually to nearly 2.5% in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Hien16698 | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | Bao Trang | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | dophantuan | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | Sukeerty | 67 | view |
| 2018-08-14 | Dung nguyen | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4375 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.326573968 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508928571429 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.2307674253 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.444444444 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 5.23603664747 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249262570052 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123671394524 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582963908748 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182592622593 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530948773288 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.