The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph depicts the shift in the birth rates of 2 countries over the course of 80 years starting in 1920. Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the birth rates in both countries witnessed a downward trend. Throughout the examined period, the proportion of birth in China registered the highest figures out of 2 groups.
In 1920-1935, the birth rate in American fluctuated, although it still remained above 10 percent before significant dropping to 5 percent in 1945. In 1950, the figure drastically increased tripled to exactly 20%, which was its highest point during the 80-year period. Throughout the remainder of the period, there was a gradual decline in the US birth rate, which fell to about 7% which was also the bottom of the line.
At the beginning of the period, the percentage of birth in China varied more significantly than the US. There has been growth in the number of birth in 1930-1935 before dropping sharply to 5% which remained from1940 to 1945. A similar trend of the US was experienced in the percentage of birth, which also rapidly increased from 5% to 20% between 1945 and 1950 in China. However, this proportion of birth decreased steeply to approximately 7% in 5 years later, falling to approximately 2% by 2000
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Hien16698 | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | Bao Trang | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | dophantuan | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | Sukeerty | 67 | view |
| 2018-08-14 | Dung nguyen | 73 | view |
- Topic 11
- The table gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 73
- Car uses of three countries from 2003 to 2009 78
- If spending money on protection of animal or dealing with problems of humans 91
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ighest point during the 80-year period. Throughout the remainder of the period, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85185185185 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7498441158 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550925925926 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 15.8417170787 43.030603864 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.8 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158985220423 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703205308786 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366360071114 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118416460649 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407529776953 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.