The table compares the percentage of students who attended four different types of secondary schools in 2000, 2005, 2009.
The table compares the percentage of students who attended four different types of secondary schools in 2000, 2005, 2009.
Looking at the table, overall, The proportion of pupils in the specialist, grammar, voluntary- controlled schools witnessed a downward trend whereas that of community schools experienced an upward trend over the period. Throughout the examined period, the rate of learners coming to voluntary-controlled schools was the highest while that of students in specialist schools registered the lowest out of four types.
At the beginning of the period, the percentage of students attending grammar schools was the highest point of over half of total learners but in 2009, this figure significantly decreased to one out of two students. The similar trend was seen in the percentage of people coming to grammar schools which collapsed from 24% in 2000 to 12% in 9 years later. There was a gradual decline in the rate of students who attended specialist schools from 12% in 2000 to 10% in 2009
In contrast, only 12% of school children went to community schools in the year 2000, but this proportion rose significantly to 32% in 2005 and then 58% in 2009. In that year, not only was this the highest attendance figure for the four types of schools, but also the percentage of pupils in community schools was higher than the combined percentage of children attending the other three types of secondary school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-27 | Dung nguyen | 67 | view |
- If spending money on protection of animal or dealing with problems of humans 91
- The table gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 73
- Animals become extinct. Reasons and solutions? 84
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today.What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue? 78
- Car uses of three countries from 2003 to 2009 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, second, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06808510638 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86992806499 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472340425532 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.5030611352 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.142857143 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5714285714 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488909927053 0.215688989381 227% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.289954572674 0.103423049105 280% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.300971262008 0.0843802449381 357% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.423551854041 0.15604864568 271% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.340887558052 0.0819641961636 416% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.