Animals become extinct. Reasons and solutions?
In light of the exorable population and developing economy, humans are imposing an imminent threat to animals. In this essay, I will demonstrate the expansion of cities and some activities of manufactures have adverse effects on the survival of animals and propose several viable solutions to remedy these problems.
There are two main reasons in which humans are contributing to the disappearance of many species. Firstly, global population is staggering at the alarming rate. Therefore, the construction of urban areas, by extension, mass deforestation have deprived these species of their natural habitat. Animals which can not adapt to the new living environment are vulnerable to driven to extinct. Another culprit of extinction is industrialization. As a lot of manufacturing factories proliferate, the amount of waste toxic discharged into rivers or seas without undergoing the process of treatment is directly threatening the lives of marine life. Formosa perfectly exemplifies this dire situation. The chemicals released from this steel company triggered the death of countless fish in the sea in Central Viet Nam.
In order to mitigate the aforementioned situation, governments need to take a number of steps. One of those is for local authorities to build shelters for endangered species. This would help ensure biodiversity in areas where animals are vulnerable to habit loss. Another solution could be to impose more stringent regulations on manufactures in terms of waste treatment. For instance, there should be a limit on the amount of toxic waste released to rivers must undergo a rigorous treatment process to make sure that all pollutants are removed. The implication of this is that marine life of some kinds of animals is likely to inhabitable.
In conclusion, humans activities are to blame for dying out animals, so given measures should be implemented in order to conserve wildlife.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40939597315 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13287699199 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620805369128 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5645599103 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8235294118 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146981547453 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421253961253 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547160521579 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0715921497234 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428294339904 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.