Car uses of three countries from 2003 to 2009
The table compares cars produced in Argentina, Australia, Thailand in three years 2003, 2005, 2009.
Looking at the table, Argentina experienced a downward trend in the number of cars produced while the figure for Australia and Thailand increased from 2003 to 2009. Throughout the examined period, Thailand registered the highest number out of three nations.
Commencing at the lowest number of 200,000 cars produced in Australia, compared to 700,000 cars in Thailand. This number in Australia increased double to 400,000 2 years later, then continued to rose by 200,000 cars in 2009. Production of cars in Thailand went through fluctuation from 2003 to 2009. The number in 2003 rocketed to 1,119,000 in 2005 while in that year car manufacture doubled in Australia. However, production of cars in Thailand went down to 990,000 at the end of the period, although Thailand remained the major car producer.
By contrast, there was a decline in the car production in Argentina from 2003 to 2009. Beginning at 400,000 cars in 2003, Argentina ranked the second producing country. However, this number halved to 200,000 in 2005 and plunged to the bottom of 161,000 in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-28 | ledinhphong | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | phungnguyen1611 | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-30 | Dung nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-30 | Dung nguyen | 79 | view |
- Rising Sea Levels: Causes and Effects 78
- The table compares the percentage of students who attended four different types of secondary schools in 2000, 2005, 2009. 67
- Environment and solutions 89
- The average annual expenditure of college students from three countries 73
- Car uses of three countries from 2003 to 2009 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nufacture doubled in Australia. However, production of cars in Thailand went down...
^^
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of cars in Thailand went down to 990,000 at the end of the period, although Thai...
^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wn to 990,000 at the end of the period, although Thailand remained the major car...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15789473684 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68814984413 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468421052632 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3823651934 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0909090909 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310719566224 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168132477892 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103750933697 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243014677424 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028050415139 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.