The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025.
The given diagram provides a comparison of the amount of energy consumed and manufactured in the US over a 50-year period even a prediction for 2025.
From an overall perspective, it is apparent that the production and consumption of energy experienced a fluctuated trend over the years shown and projections will witness a gradual increase in their volume.
Now getting back to the details, it is noticeable that both used and produced energy met the same record in 1950 which accounted for more than 25 quadrillions BUTs. Subsequently, from 1950 to 1975, the imported energy varied greatly and had declivity in this number. Despite the oscillation throughout the period, these amounts still had the same pattern in 1975, which was around more than 50 quadrillion BUTs, and there is no energy imported in this year. Following that, the US energy consumption dramatically raised from 60 energy units in 1975 to nearly 100 energy units in 2000 while US energy production just merely grew by 15 units.
In the 2000s, both factors observed an increment in their number. The US energy consumption raised remarkedly by 35 units after 20 years while the US manufactured energy just raised from 65 units in 2000 to 15 units in 2020. In 2020, the energy units for import activity occupied for 45 units in one nation. Based on the prediction, it is conspicuous that the energy usage will stand at 140 units which more than double when compared with the energy supply and the energy for import will rocket by 20 units at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-01 | NSMDeadshot0411 | view | |
| 2022-12-01 | NSMDeadshot0411 | view | |
| 2022-07-09 | quytnee | 82 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | Gulinoza | 80 | view |
| 2022-01-16 | Diyorbek Zaripboyev | 78 | view |
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 73
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 84
- Few people devote time to hobbies nowadays Say why you think this is the case and what effect this has on the individual and society in general Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 263.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85931558935 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66122756807 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524714828897 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8448746028 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2222222222 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281014990751 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124458551755 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683063670541 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174929469213 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399166204737 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.