The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The rendered line graph depicts the information pertaining the amount of energy produced and consumed in the United States of America between 1950 and 2000 as well as a forecast for 2025. The data has been calibrated in units.
On a fleeting glance, it is vivid that the consumption and production of energy in US was near about 25 units at the begining of 1950 and grew steadly with minor differnce reached 55 and 65 units for consumption and production respectively in 1975.
Moving further, after 1975 utilisation of energy was growing faster than production. As a result, US had to import approximately 20 units of energy till 2000. The gap between demand and supply was increasing with time and it is estimated that demand of supply will reached at peak level of 140 units in 2025 which will be twofold higher than production of energy.
Overall, the consumption of energy was higher than production , thus US was forced to import energy to fulfill the insufficient supply.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-01 | NSMDeadshot0411 | view | |
| 2022-12-01 | NSMDeadshot0411 | view | |
| 2021-11-17 | habib.mib | 67 | view |
| 2020-10-26 | jazzlen | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-11 | Alina18092000 | 65 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 79
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club s activities facilities and opening hours Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make any comparisons whe 73
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 It also predicts figures for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ON_FIRST_GLANCE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'at'?
Suggestion: At
...e data has been calibrated in units. On a fleeting glance, it is vivid that the...
^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'reach'
Suggestion: reach
...is estimated that demand of supply will reached at peak level of 140 units in 2025 whic...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ion of energy was higher than production , thus US was forced to import energy to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, thus, well, as for, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91017964072 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73415866086 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586826347305 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.719407899 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.142857143 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201384376953 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901767345903 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680188062134 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132285728206 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401103036335 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.