The line diagram illustrates Energy usage in USA segregated in six different fuel source since year 1980 to present and prediction till year 2030. The unit of measure is Quadrillion units. Overall, it can be clearly seen that Petro and Oil was leading source of energy in 1980, and expected to remain on top position in 2030.
In terms of Petro and Oil, it started with exact 35 in year 1980, which dropped to approximately 31 in 1985, however it followed upward trend afterwards and reached approx. 43 in 2018. This trend expected to continue till 2030 to reach figure of just below 50. The coal stood at slightly above 15 in 1980, which is expected to reach almost two times figure(approximately 32) in year 2030.
On the other hand, Natural Gas consumption was 4 more than that of Coal in 1980, which fluctuates till year 2015 to reach peak value of 25 and expected to levelled out in future years. The renewable energy sources had insignificant share in year 1980, and this is not expected to change until 2030.
In conclusion, Petro and Oil outstripped other energy sources during given duration, whereas renewable energy sources had minimal impact on overall energy consumption in USA.
- The graph below given information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 73
- People like working for a company rather than starting their own business Why is this the case What can be done to encourage people to start their own business 89
- the graph shows the oil production capacity in 6 countries between 1990 and 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'source' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sources'.
Suggestion: sources
...in USA segregated in six different fuel source since year 1980 to present and predicti...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted to remain on top position in 2030. In terms of Petro and Oil, it started wi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85853658537 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66868058 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580487804878 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5122509001 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219284326811 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825078623021 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574753143711 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137600059327 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270071983158 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.