The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph given below illustrates energy consumption in America since 1980 with projections until 2030. The data is measured in quadrillion units. Overall, it can be seen that petrol and oil were the highest while hydropower represented the least usage.
First of all, looking to petrol and oil, stood at 35 in 1980, the rate experienced some fluctuations from 1985 to 2005. However, by 2030, the demand for this energy increases rapidly at 50 which was the highest number throughout the period. Followed by natural gas, it began at 20 in 1980. 1985 to 2015 the figure was fluctuating, levelling off the period at 25 in 2030. Initially, coal was the third option, it got more than 15 in 1980, but the needed on it overtook natural gas in 1985, 2000, 2005, 2015 before it reached a peak of 30 in 2030.
Less change was seen on the remaining sources. Nuclear, solar/wind, hydropower had precise units at around 4 in 1980. After years later, nuclear touched 6 in 2030, trailed by solar/wind, it had 5. 1985 to 2030, there was a slight decline in this energy level to only 3 which is representing the smallest fuel request.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | neverlandforestcat | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-10 | brew | 78 | view |
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 78
- The Pie Charts Below Show The Comparison of Different Kinds of Energy Production of France in Two Years 78
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 84
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main export in 2000 20 and future projection for 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The Charts Below Show US Spending Patterns between 1966 and 1996 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, look, so, third, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72222222222 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60502778845 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661616161616 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4665591635 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.9166666667 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139445457926 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532579649253 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851742879927 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106476159982 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625300264897 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.