The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030

Essay topics:

The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.

The line graph illustrates the amount of energy consumed in America from 1980 to 2008 with predictions made for the next 22 years. Overall, the use of fossil fuels dominates that of renewable energy. It is also noticeable that the consumption of petrol and oil, and coal experiences the highest increase over the given period.

In 1980, the amount of burnt petrol and oil was approximately 35 quadrillion, which almost doubled that of natural gas, at over 20 quadrillion. Slightly less natural gas was burnt at that time, with its figure being just above 15 quadrillion. The consumption of petrol and oil witnessed a significant increase to about 40 quadrillion for the next 28 years, similarly, that of the other fossil fuels both went through a growth of almost 2.5 quadrillion. Petrol and oil consumption is expected to reach a peak at nearly 50 quadrillion, being the most consumed fuel source in 2030. Meanwhile, the figure for used coal and natural gas, though forecasted to experience a rise, will be slightly lower, at about 30 and 23 quadrillion, respectively.

The usage of hydropower and solar/wind stayed static at around 4.5 quadrillion from 1980 to 2008 and is projected to not vary much until 2030. In contrast, that of nuclear power climbed gradually to 6 quadrillion in 2008 and is anticipated to remain flat until the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-21 Ahmad_off 61 view
2024-06-19 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-06-19 Giang Tran 73 view
2023-12-17 neverlandforestcat 67 view
2023-12-10 brew 78 view
Essays by user lydia231232 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9519650655 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89486387203 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554585152838 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2166153967 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.4 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177241193573 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746813602445 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735077164738 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144414076259 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557110913864 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.