The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The line graph describes information about six types of fossil fuels and renewable sources in terms of the amount being consumed in America from 1980 to 2030 according to a 2008 report.
Overall, it is clear that petrol and oil and oil accounts the largest proportion of the Energy consumption. Furthermore, while the usage of renewable resources remains comparatively stable, an increasing trend can be observed in fossil fuels usage.
Petrol and oil are the most important energy sources throughout the period: despite fluctuation in the first 15 years, the consumption of these two fuels rose steadily, and this is projected to persist, reaching 50q in 2030. In 1980, the energy consumption generated by Coal was slightly higher than Natural Gas (20 quadrillion units compared with 15 quadrillion units). While the amount of coal consumed is predicted to climb to 30 quadrillion units in 2030, the figure for natural gas will remain stable/ unchanged at 25 quadrillion units.
Other fuel sources are less significant with the figures of less than 5 quadrillion units. Nuclear power consumption saw a steady increase to around 8q in 2005 and maintained this level until 2015, after which the level of consumption will experience an insignificant change. The use of solar/wind and hydropower is limited, with the figures being anticipated to around 5 quadrillion units and 4 quadrillion units to 2030.
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000. 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...980 to 2030 according to a 2008 report. Overall, it is clear that petrol and oil...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt energy sources throughout the period: despite fluctuation in the first 15 year...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.31472081218 4.92477711251 128% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 12.683236582 2.65546596893 478% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609137055838 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6380112107 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.222222222 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213040115409 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807153858069 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744414824864 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12858034987 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870681680252 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.32 11.4140731707 169% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.