The line graph illustrates in consumption of six various kinds of energy in the USA from 1980 to 2030.
As can be seen from the chart, the majority of fossil fuels are used in comparison with renewable energy sources. The trend is upward over the period shown form 1980 to 2030, excepted to natural gas until nearly 2015.
Initially, in 1980 the highest energy consumption was petrol and oil at 35 quadrillion units while nuclear, solar/ wind and hydropower were lowest at approximately 5 quadrillion units. Following this trend, the less coal was burned in that time, just over 15 quadrillion units. In Comparison, the consumption of natural gas was more popular than coal, at standing by 5 quadrillion units.
In 2030, the petrol and oil are predicted to increase and peaked at nearly 50 quadrillion units. Despite some variations over the time shown, it is estimated that the coal will rise gradually by 5 quadrillion units compared to 1980 that outnumbered than natural gas about 5 quadrillion units. The amount of energy consumption of nuclear, solar/wind and Hydropower, are slight predicted to go up about nearly 7 quadrillion units, 5 quadrillion units, and 3 quadrillion units respectively.
- The chart shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000. 11
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003, 2006 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think that this is a positive or negative development? 67
- The maps below show the information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now. 73
- Some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behaviour while others say the amount of time children they spend watching Tv influences their behavior. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., and 3 quadrillion units respectively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08585858586 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94271134261 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2216374229 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.888888889 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131923174432 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720162756278 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630809582223 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119279339305 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725766637269 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.