A glance at the line graph illustrates the changes in the consumption of energy in the USA from 1980 with projections until 2030.
Overall, the utilization of energy has risen in each fuel type between 1980 and 2030. Particularly, petrol and oil is now used and predicted to be the most wide-use energy.
In 1980, petrol and oil stood at exactly 35 quadrillion in its consumption and kept increasing to nearly 43 quadrillion at the present time. This trend is projected to continue till reach at about 48 q in 2030.
At the beginning, the use of energy was common with precisely 20 q for natural gas and approximately 17 q for coal. After these figures fluctuated and met each other at some points of time, the utilization of coal is forecasted to grow just over 30 q in 2030 while natural gas remains constant at 25 q since 2014.
In the year of 1980, the consumption of renewable energy was the least popular with only 4 q. Those use of nuclear, solar/wind, hydropower all grew slightly from 1980 to 2019 and are predicted to keep following this trend until reach 6q, 5q and around 3q, respectively.
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- The diagram below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65482233503 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78336496229 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598984771574 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0446910899 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.888888889 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188050262246 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905757074867 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869984301623 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124811363491 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968279221415 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.