This report is going to summaries the information presented on line graph compared the percentage of British people, who were the owners of one car, two cars, three or more cars and had no car between 1971 and 2007.
After giving a quick look on graph, it is clear that the proportion of two and three or more than three cars owners rose steadily,while, this figure took a nosedive over a given period of 36 years.
Giving a cursory glance on line graph, it is manifest that in 1971, the percentage of no car owners was the highest, which was just under the half, whereas, the rate of one car, two cars, and three and more than three cars owners was stood at around 42% , 8% and 2% respectively. In the terms of one car ownership, after some fluctuations the proportion of Britishers remained similar at the end, which was almost 45%. The number of no cars owners declined gradually at around 48% in the year 1971 to almost 25% in the year 2007.
When it comes to two cars and three or more cars owners, these figures showed similar trends. Approximately a quarter of total Britishers had the ownership of two cars, while, this data rose steeply for three or more cars.
- some people say government should subsidised the fruits and vegetables to make healthy food cheaper. Some other say it should be tax to unhealthy food. 56
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 73
- some people say government should subsidised the fruits and vegetables to make healthy food cheaper. Some other say it should be tax to unhealthy food. 56
- The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 83
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...ore than three cars owners rose steadily,while, this figure took a nosedive over a giv...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s rose steadily,while, this figure took a nosedive over a given period of 36 years. Giv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hree cars owners was stood at around 42% , 8% and 2% respectively. In the terms o...
^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cars owners was stood at around 42% , 8% and 2% respectively. In the terms of one...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53990610329 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45238079086 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511737089202 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1643640944 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.142857143 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224301563114 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114763257148 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577163978732 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147700190879 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630922176823 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.