The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph given compares the relationship between fertility and mortality rate changed over period of two centuries from 1901 in New Zealand
Overall, what stands out according to the chart is the dominance of the number of infants born compared to that of people passing away until 2021. However, the death rate seemed follow the upward trends more stably and the year 2041 is predicted to mark the point at which it will overtake the other rate, which experienced erratic behaviour with varied trends.
Specifically, commencing with 20000 babies given birth in 1901, doubling those dying at the same time, the birth rate in the country of New Zealand was recorded a dip in 1941 before sharply increasing to slightly under 70000 after another 20 years. Subsequent to that boom in the fertility rate in New Zealand, it saw a relative drop of 20000 in 1981, followed by a rebound to 60000 in 2001. The period of 100 years from 1901 to 2001 recorded a continual growth in death rate, which by and by narrowed the distubance between two rate
As a result, a prospective change in the fertility and mortality rate of New Zealand citizens was shown in the chart. While the former figure is anticipated to steadily decrease from 2041 onwards, it is thought that there will be considerable upturn in the latter, marked by years 2061 where it is likely to surpass the birth rate before a period of level-off.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-10 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 10
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the country of New Zealand was recorded a dip in 1941 before sharply increasing ...
^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: SUBSEQUENT_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'after'
Suggestion: After
...tly under 70000 after another 20 years. Subsequent to that boom in the fertility rate in New...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...20 years. Subsequent to that boom in the fertility rate in New Zealand, it saw a ...
^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tility and mortality rate of New Zealand citizens was shown in the chart. While ...
^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f New Zealand citizens was shown in the chart. While the former figure is antici...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80737704918 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50552667805 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569672131148 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.5911406321 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 195.5 112.824112599 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.6666666667 22.9334400587 177% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20833588943 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10447787118 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437775805387 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134150451265 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577121606924 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.2329268293 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.8 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.3012195122 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.51 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.