The graph below gives the information about the common activities children of different ages do as part of their bedtime routine.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart presents activities usually done by American children at different ages before their bedtime.
Overall, reading is the top chosen activity for all the three age groups, while watching TV and eating are the activities which receive the far less interest from them.
As for the ages 1-3, children enjoy reading most as part of their bedtime schedule, with over 60%. It also appears that quite a medium proportion of these kids like taking a bath before going to bed, at precisely 40%. Interestingly, many of this group skip brushing teeth at night, and most of them do not consider watching TV or having supper as main part of the bedtime routine.
Regarding the two older age groups, the similar pattern is transparent: the reading activity leads the highest proportions. As children grow up, they are more aware of brushing teeth at night, so an upward tendency emerges with the rise to over 15% and 20% respectively for the two age stages. Watching TV is similar yet goes up minimally; in contrast, eating goes down twice in both groups.
- The bar charts show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia Darwin 1 Sydney 2 Melbourne 3 Brisbane 4 Perth 5 and Canberra 6 in October 2009 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva
- It is better to learn the way people lived in the past through films and video records than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested about finding out the history of the house or the building the live in Why is this the case How can people research this 89
- The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make co 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4905084887 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664835164835 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6705423737 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151292548633 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695772884702 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055416429078 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976486262227 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404536727513 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.