The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world.
The line graph illustrates the data about the number of people who visited North America, Central and Eastern Europe, South-East Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and South America between 1990 and 2005.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the total quantity of tourists rose in all five parts of the globe. However, Sub-Saharan Africa and South America witnessed an extremely narrow gap between them, compared to the others.
Looking at the details, as regards North America, the number of tourists stood at 70 million in 1990, which was the highest total. There was a gradual rise to 90 mil...
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.Discuss both these views and give your own o 90
- The pie charts below show the share of Oscar winners by film genre for 2003 and 2008 summarise the information by selecting and reporting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 53
- The tables and pie chart show in percentage terms of the results of a survey of a new shopping complex in Auckland New Zealand 79
- The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advanced technology which can prevent and solve a crime.Do you agree or disagree? 70
Comments
Essay evaluation report
suggestions:
read essays by following top users and see the different styles:
http://testbig.com/users/dilbar
http://www.testbig.com/users/mrmo2610
http://www.testbig.com/users/xthangbm
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 245 200
No. of Characters: 1210 1000
No. of Different Words: 134 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.956 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.939 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.541 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 93 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 67 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 33 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.087 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.447 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.673 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.108 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, so, then, third, as for, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11020408163 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6061791821 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567346938776 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0378366912 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.2 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0638156691578 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305742382154 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417392954514 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0498575530687 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299000822022 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.