The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world.
The line chart shows the proportion of foreign visitor arrivals in different areas of the world between 1990 and 2005.
It is clear that there was an increasing number of international tourist arrivals in those areas mentioned.
From the beginning year, North America became the most visited place, visited by 70 million visitors, and rose gradually to around 90 million for the next 10 years. In the following year, the figure remained stable to just slightly under 90 million.
In 1990, the number of international tourists visiting Central and Eastern Europe was over half that of North America. The former soared from 30 million to above 80 million over 15 years.
Similarly, South East Asia climbed gradually in visits from approximately 20 million to under 50 million in the final years. Both sub-Saharan African and South America were visited by less than 10 million foreign visitors at the start of the period, seeing a minimal increase by around 5 million, almost 20 million and 15 million respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | nguyen thai binh | 78 | view |
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea. What are the reasons and solutions? 84
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world 76
- The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1377245509 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62952670638 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616766467066 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0495104967 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.079124918124 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049614224517 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664494409757 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0732315555282 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685121122499 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.