The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two plans illustrate how a small coastal village developed as a tourist resort in Europe within 30 years. It is clear that the population rose dramatically in 2004 and numerous new constructions were built
Looking at the maps in more detail, the north area of maps shows that there are two village, forest, livestock of sheep and goats, and olive farms in 1974. In contrast, the woodland was cut down to make way for a golf course in 2004. Similarly, olive groves inland were replaced with a big farmland where fruit and vegetable were planted and those are used for hotels.
The south of the village experienced a striking change in which harbor was knocked down and switched to beach areas. Moreover, the fishing village remained at its original location, however many hotels were built near the beach. A new road was constructed to connect from the south-east place on the maps to the village in the top right-hand corner of the maps.
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world 76
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea. What are the reasons and solutions? 84
- The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 59
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd numerous new constructions were built Looking at the maps in more detail, the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'villages'?
Suggestion: villages
...h area of maps shows that there are two village, forest, livestock of sheep and goats, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, moreover, similarly, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7987804878 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49844538219 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664634146341 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9258750509 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.428571429 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126598011893 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557373610143 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457977607343 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0820910641071 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240559492937 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.