The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given maps illustrate how a small fishing village had been transformed into a large tourist center over 30-year period. Overall, it can be clearly seen that there are numerous tourist facilities installing in area, which leads to total change in its layout.
As is presented from the map, although government remained fishing village unchanged, it was fully surrounded by residential accommodations and hotel systems alongside the beach. Also, it is noticeable that harbor was demolished to make way for sandy long beach.
To the West, woodland had been chopped down to construct the golf course for tourism purpose. Besides, small northern village was expanded by tourist shops locating next to farmland. A road was built in order to connect North-Eastern village of the map and hotel complex leading to the beach. Sheep and goats were removed to make land for houses. Trees around were also cut down for housing.
- International community must ensure that all countries reduce the consumption of fossil fuels such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think job satisfaction is more important than job security. But others believe that people can not always enjoy their jobs and having a permanent job is more important. Discuss both view and give your opinon. 78
- Topic More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 82
- Some people think that education should help students to be useful to the whole society, while other people think that education should provide students with opportunities to archieve personal ambitious. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- With increasing populations and ever growing urban centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What are benefits of protecting places for natural beauty spots How can it be solved 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62941480604 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.7 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2752238679 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15683650451 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583771655917 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509792645978 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107359836388 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512246812748 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.